From: Trans Date: 2007-11-20T23:24:00+09:00 Subject: Re: is there an nicer way for this expression? On Nov 20, 7:38 am, Remco Hh wrote: > hi, > perhaps a stupid question. > > i do this a lot: if (foo.bar==1 or foo.bar==2) > > can i make this expression shorter and nicer?, > something like if (foo.bar=1,2), which of course doesn't work :) One way: if [1,2].include?(foo.bar) # ... end another: case foo.bar when 1,2 then # ... end T.