From: Trans <transfire@...>
Date: 2007-11-19T23:30:23+09:00
Subject: Re: prettier documentation



On Nov 19, 7:42 am, Christophe Mckeon <chromatoph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i finally found the answer to my question through quasi-random googling.
> shame that nice templates likehttp://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2005/4/8/rdoc-templateare not included, by
> default. maybe there should be a gem with additional rdoc templates or
> something.
>
> > how is the documentation forhttp://rake.rubyforge.org/and
> >http://syntax.rubyforge.org/api/generated?
> > i like the look of it much better than vanilla rdoc.

I don't undertand why the jamis template isn't included.

you might try allison though.