From: Nobuyoshi Nakada Date: 2007-11-16T17:17:20+09:00 Subject: Re: Alternative Ruby grammar Hi, n At Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:20:02 +0900, Markus Liedl wrote in [ruby-talk:279241]: > The advantages are less complexity and more flexibility. I got default > values for block formals working (believed impossible with MRI parser; > but let me emphasize this grammar doesn't primarily want to extend > Ruby. I was just seeking what's possible). I don't think it impossible, and I've posted a patch once. -- Nobu Nakada