From: Jay Levitt Date: 2007-11-13T12:24:59+09:00 Subject: Re: Porting Ruby: 1.8 or 1.9? On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:03:08 -0500, Jay Levitt wrote: > Can anbody recommend which tree - 1.8 or 1.9 - is easier to port to oddball > systems? Anyone done that lately? I seem to remember hearing about Ruby > running on a phone. Answer my own question and give a tip to Googlers: For the moment, anyway, Ruby 1.9 requires Ruby to build itself. So that'd be a bad idea. -- Jay Levitt | Boston, MA | My character doesn't like it when they Faster: jay at jay dot fm | cry or shout or hit. http://www.jay.fm | - Kristoffer