From: Phlip <phlip_cpp@...>
Date: 2001-12-07T06:33:59+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:27753] RE:  Lapidary's return value

Nathaniel Talbott wrote:

> Seriously, though, this is a feature I've found useful myself (those
> have the highest incidence of inclusion into Lapidary) and which I have
> added support for in the CVS. Currently I would suggest being careful
> with the CVS version, as it is in quite a state of flux, but in general
> it should be usable (at least all the tests run!) As far as the next
> version release, I am working on it, if a bit more slowly than I would
> like. Perhaps, like Matz, I'll deliver a Christmas or New Year's present
> :-)

Thanks; knowing the feature was in the pipes was more important than 
knowing how to just implement it myself. I'd hate to override a bit of 
Lapidary in a way that the next version would break, or (even worse) 
shipping a hacked up bit of Lapidary with my own app.

-- 
Phlip

http://www.greencheese.org/HatTrick