From: Dan <dan.macdaddy+ruby@...>
Date: 2007-11-05T14:29:46+09:00
Subject: Re: def blah do |x| -- alternate method definition syntax

------=_Part_28256_26958185.1194240589126
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Apologies...

Somehow i quoted myself out:

You don't have to do blah.call, you can do blah[5] which is pretty close  :)


On 11/5/07, Dan <dan.macdaddy+ruby@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/5/07, Joe Holt <joe07734@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Which I realize is going down a different path, but still. Now I wish
> > I could do this:
> >
> > blah(5)
> >
> > But I can't. I have to blah.call.
> >
> > I'm not complaining at all. This isn't bait. It's just me loving Ruby
> > and wondering aloud. Any opinions?
> >
> > Joe
> >
> >
> >
>
>

------=_Part_28256_26958185.1194240589126--