From: Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
Date: 2007-11-03T08:26:58+09:00
Subject: Re: Who required that!?

Sean O'Halpin wrote:

> Using alias is just a little too fragile. You could always generate a
> unique alias name (using GUID or something) which would avoid the
> problem, but grabbing a reference to the existing method and using
> that is sure to work.

Can you do the latter without breaking gem's require?

-- 
       vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407