From: Chad Perrin Date: 2007-11-03T04:41:23+09:00 Subject: Re: the result of Ruby official logo contest On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:03:00PM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote: > > Ugh. That's the worst. I don't know why people think that Web 2.0 > logos would be a good idea here. Talk about dating yourself quickly > ... to 2006. Ignore the surroundings and fluff for a moment. The core image is simple, elegant, versatile, and easily slotted into any general-purpose application of a logo (favicons, t-shirts, stickers, websites, et cetera). It doesn't require major modifications to suit it well to different purposes, and with only minor additions or tweaks can be adjusted to fit the standards of hipness for any marketing era. Examples of logos with that sort of timeless flexibility include, but are not limited to: the AT&T "Death Star" the Windows wavy-window (though they've screwed with it a lot) the Apple apple the SGI hypercube the Sun diagonal square (whith the clever "u + n = S" motif) the Target target Notice that the AT&T "Death Star" logo has gained a definite three-dimensional appearance [http://att.com], the Microsoft Windows wavy-window is now softly center-lit and acquired both a three-dimensional look and simplified pastel feel [http://microsoft.com/en/us/default.aspx], the Apple apple is looking mirrored and glossy these days, and even the Target target has acquired a drop-reflection somewhere along the way. SGI hs, for some reason, decided its logo should just be three letters (it looks like crap now), but Sun's logo hasn't really undergone any modifications to fit the new sense of what catches people's eyes -- though it was well-enough designed that it fits in with a color-gradient background on the website perfectly anyway [http://sun.com/]. These logos have all gone through a number of incarnations over the years, to fit the current marketing imagery paradigm, but have largely remained unmolested in their core design philosophies. They've worked for years, and have contributed to the visibility and recognizability of the organizations they represent. These logos have some things in common: simplicity elegance versatility flexibility of application easily fit into changing trends in marketing imagery Sound familiar? -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Phillip J. Haack: "Productivity is not about speed. It's about velocity. You can be fast, but if you're going in the wrong direction, you're not helping anyone."