From: CodeToad Date: 2007-10-31T23:45:24+09:00 Subject: Re: What's in YOUR Ruby??? Could Ruby ever be a g.p. dev language? Hi Ed, On Oct 25, 10:17 pm, "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" wrote: > CodeToad wrote: [...snip...] > > What are you doing with ruby? > > Pretty much anything I can. At the moment I'm seeing how tightly I can > tweak the interpreter using "standard" Gnu/Linux tricks. Hope you write that up! > > What would you *like* to do with ruby? > > The "big bad project" is something called RAMEAU > (http://cougar.rubyforge.org/svn/trunk/Rameau/Rameau.pdf), which is > really more like a Linux distro than a Ruby project, although all of the > infrastructure above the (Gentoo) Linux level is in Ruby. But I have > some smaller things I want to do as well. > [...snip...] because I can hack on existing Lisp code like AthenaCL and Common Music. Yea! Another Lisp Guy. > When I do something numeric/statistical, I do it in R, and when I do > scripting/DSL/etc., I do it in Ruby. Me too. R/S/S+. Also use a lot of monte carlo and predictive/ constrained decision support, so I still pay decisioneering and @risk in C++. I still really like to stick with oo. > > Do you see ruby as a focal-point or general purpose language? > > It's general purpose in the sense that it's a good combination of the > best parts of Perl and Java. But it's not general purpose in the same > sense as C or C++ -- yet. :) > I can't get over my general dislike for Java. Seems like a lot of work to do anything done. > > Has anyone worked with ruby along side c++ ? > > There are plenty of interfaces to C++ code in Ruby -- most of the major > C++ open source libraries have Ruby bindings, for example. Found 'em and putting them to work! > > Has anyone tryed ruby with Qt4 ? > > There is an excellent Ruby library/binding for both Qt3 and Qt4. > > > How about ruby with a big, bad oo-database like Objectivity? > > Never heard of it. > Fast, sweet, no more 00-to-relational mapping, just about zero DBA work some AI features built in. Eats huge amounts of XML. Likes smalltalk. I've seen it used to create those huge node-and-branch maps. It seems that a lot of 3 letter agencies use it quite a bit, which makes sense. I can see it used well in economertics and regional data (not really GIS). one of my few clients who pay on time brokers inetlllectual property, and as far as I know I'm one of the few using american options and I can easily see using something like that for the IP work. > > > > Thanks, > >OldCodeToad > > TheOldCodeToad att gmaillll.commercial- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -