From: "Michael W. Ryder" <_mwryder@...> Date: 2007-10-31T11:40:05+09:00 Subject: Re: [ANN] the result of Ruby official logo contest Mikel Lindsaar wrote: > From a design point of view, it has a number of flaws and I find it > washed out and not as beautiful and striking as the exisiting logo. > > I read through the comments on the website... aisde from the > unconstructive, inane slander which is unneeded, the professional > negative comments about sum up my view on this logo. > > My 2c. > > I think it could be improved with a bit of touch up. > A couple of seconds experimenting with PhotoShop and the Spotlight filter gave me, what I felt, was a much improved version of the original design. Maybe the original wasn't as bad as the saved version. A lot of programs seem to filter out some of the design when saving it to anything but it's native format. > Mikel > > On 10/30/07, Peter Szinek wrote: >> Robert Dober wrote: >>> On 10/30/07, Benjohn Barnes wrote: >>>> On 30 Oct 2007, at 09:15, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: >>>>> |[3] http://www.ruby-assn.org/ruby-logo.jpg >>>> It's a little like an invitingly open door way. >>>> >>>> Will the other submissions also be available? >>> Good point, although I have to say right away, this is a beauty, well done! >> This is really interesting... The (so far 2) answers here are quite... >> hmm... different compared to the (so far 59) answers here: >> >> http://www.rubyinside.com/so-heres-the-new-ruby-logo-639.html#comments >> >> Does this mean that the Ruby world is clustered into (at least) 2 sets >> of people: contributors to the Ruby mailing list and readers of the >> rubyinside.com blog? Obviously not, but the contrast between the >> quantity and content of the comments on the mailing list vs rubyinside >> is pretty striking. >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> ___ >> http://www.rubyrailways.com >> http://scrubyt.org >> >> >> >> >> >