From: Mikel Lindsaar <raasdnil@...>
Date: 2007-10-30T21:06:31+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] the result of Ruby official logo contest

From a design point of view, it has a number of flaws and I find it
washed out and not as beautiful and striking as the exisiting logo.

I read through the comments on the website... aisde from the
unconstructive, inane slander which is unneeded, the professional
negative comments about sum up my view on this logo.

My 2c.

I think it could be improved with a bit of touch up.

Mikel

On 10/30/07, Peter Szinek <peter@rubyrailways.com> wrote:
> Robert Dober wrote:
> > On 10/30/07, Benjohn Barnes <benjohn@fysh.org> wrote:
> >> On 30 Oct 2007, at 09:15, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> >>> |[3] http://www.ruby-assn.org/ruby-logo.jpg
> >> It's a little like an invitingly open door way.
> >>
> >> Will the other submissions also be available?
> > Good point, although I have to say right away, this is a beauty, well done!
>
> This is really interesting... The (so far 2) answers here are quite...
> hmm... different compared to the (so far 59) answers here:
>
> http://www.rubyinside.com/so-heres-the-new-ruby-logo-639.html#comments
>
> Does this mean that the Ruby world is clustered into (at least) 2 sets
> of people: contributors to the Ruby mailing list and readers of the
> rubyinside.com blog? Obviously not, but the contrast between the
> quantity and content of the comments on the mailing list vs rubyinside
> is pretty striking.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
> ___
> http://www.rubyrailways.com
> http://scrubyt.org
>
>
>
>
>