From: David Alan Black Date: 2001-12-06T00:20:50+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:27553] Re: New RubyGarden Poll - this one affectsus all :) Hello -- On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Bill Kelly wrote: > > From: "Bob Hutchison" > [...] > > I think the ruby-garden poll, while fun, perhaps, is missing the point. Does > > anyone routinely *use* the message numbers that cannot use headers (if you > > are using procmail you can easily put them back, right :-)? Is *anyone* > > going to miss them? Is there actually something useful to be done with these > > that could mitigate the inconvenience? > > I'd miss 'em. See [ruby-talk:27530] for an example of their use. Me too. We need *some* way to refer clearly back and forth to old messages. David -- David Alan Black home: dblack@candle.superlink.net work: blackdav@shu.edu Web: http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav