From: Austin Ziegler Date: 2007-10-24T05:37:05+09:00 Subject: Re: IronRuby...will it be like J++? On 10/23/07, John Lam (DLR) wrote: > Austin Ziegler [mailto:halostatue@gmail.com]: > > I think the biggest risk to IronRuby is the CLR, not the IronRuby > > implementation itself. As noted, that's in a reasonably open license. > I'm interested in why you think that the CLR is a risk? We've standardized CLR via the CLI and there is an open-source implementation of the CLR in Mono. DLR / IronRuby should just run on Mono in binary form. Long-term risk. Microsoft could change how the CLR works to penalize a forked IronRuby, at least in theory. -austin -- Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com * http://www.halostatue.ca/ * austin@halostatue.ca * http://www.halostatue.ca/feed/ * austin@zieglers.ca