From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2001-12-05T16:39:03+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:27530] Re: Package Naming

>>>>> "J" == Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@PATH.Berkeley.EDU> writes:

J> Then, for consistency, should 
J>   def X::foo; end
J> define X as a module, if it's undefined?

 See [ruby-talk:23973] for this case

J> In any case, I'm not crazy about implicit definitions that might or
J> might not conflict with later definitions. Why not force the programmer
J> to be explicit about the class/module choice?

 Because if he want to do it, he can, i.e. he don't have the obligation to
 write module A::B if he want to write

  class A
     module B
     end
  end
  

Guy Decoux