From: Trans Date: 2007-10-23T06:50:16+09:00 Subject: Re: Conflicts between using respond_to? and extending Ruby On Oct 22, 4:35 pm, "Sean O'Halpin" wrote: > On 10/22/07, Sean O'Halpin wrote: > > > > > if donald === CanQuack > > should be > > if CanQuack === donald That's interesting. I've aliased #include as #is, and #extend as #can. I should add #can? as well, then: if donald.can? CanQuack Or just using Quack: if donald.can? Quack T.