From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Date: 2007-10-22T03:32:27+09:00
Subject: Re: RubyGems Beta 0.9.4.6

Sasa Ebach wrote:
>> 
>> With latest release some of the issue with the stub scripts for Windows 
>> got fixed.
> 
> Did that. Now I have
> 
> ...
> RubyGems system software updated
> 
> C:\Documents and Settings\Sasa>gem env
> RubyGems Environment:
>    - RUBYGEMS VERSION: 0.9.4.6 (0.9.4.6)
>    - RUBY VERSION: 1.8.6 (2007-09-24 patchlevel 111) [i386-mswin32]
>    - INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: E:/Develop/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8
>    - RUBY EXECUTABLE: E:/Develop/ruby/bin/ruby.exe
>    - RUBYGEMS PLATFORMS:
>      - ruby
>      - x86-mswin32-60
>    - GEM PATHS:
>       - E:/Develop/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8
>    - GEM CONFIGURATION:
>       - :update_sources => true
>       - :verbose => true
>       - :benchmark => false
>       - :backtrace => false
>       - :bulk_threshold => 1000
>    - REMOTE SOURCES:
>       - http://gems.rubyforge.org
> 
> Thank you very much. The new rubygems rocks!
> 
> I love the new auto platform feature. That's the way it should work and 
> now
> it does.
> 
> Here is a little thing that would also be nice. Autodownload of older
> versions of a gem if a new gem requires it. Even if a newer version of 
> the
> dependency is alreay installed:
> 
> C:\Documents and Settings\Sasa>gem install scrubyt --no-rdoc --no-ri
> Bulk updating Gem source index for: http://gems.rubyforge.org
> ERROR:  Error installing scrubyt:
>          scrubyt requires RubyInline (= 3.6.3)
> 
> C:\Documents and Settings\Sasa>gem list RubyInline
> 
> *** LOCAL GEMS ***
> 
> RubyInline (3.6.4)
> RubyInlineAcceleration (0.0.1)
> 
> Do you think this makes sense?
> 

I don't know if that's ok to do, and why scrubyt stick to = 3.6.3 of 
RubyInline?

I haven't compared with previous behavior of RubyGems, but guess that 
doesn't have changed.

Maybe a Feature Request at the RubyForge Tracker?

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=578&group_id=126&func=browse

Regards,

Luis
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.