From: mentifex@... (Arthur T. Murray) Date: 2001-12-04T22:03:04+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:27443] Re: SF vs. Savannah modulo XP AI "Hal E. Fulton" wrote in message news:<00d401c17c6e$d47ea180$0300a8c0@austin.rr.com>... > Opinion question(s). > > Is Sourceforge "really OK" for future projects or > should we go the Savannah route? [...] > http://savannah.gnu.org/ ["http://" added for dynamic linkability] ATM: Mind.Ruby proposes to "save the world" through eXtreme Programming in the emergence of true artificial intelligence for bringing about http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~phoenix/vinge/vinge-sing.html (q.v.). None will dispute that AI programming is _the_ crucial software issue of 2001+ and a language like Ruby is the most important ever, because Mind.Ruby bridges the gap between Western free-thinking AI and Japanese "groupthink society" technical supremacy in robotics. In support of Ruby and in spite of the extremely closed-minded witch-hunt mentality of its chief practitioners ("Ruby is too important to be left to the Ruby rubes." ), a quasi-foundry is http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/index.phtml/fid/1000 -- FAQTS : Computers : Programming : Languages : Ruby. > If even the most paranoid Rubyists agree that > Sourceforge is still cool, should we try to create > a Ruby foundry? I notice there's not one. ATM: There may not be a specific Ruby foundry for lack of critical mass in such a heretofore marginal language, but luckily there _is_ a Mind.Ruby Open Source Ruby OO AI coordination page at http://mind.sourceforge.net/ruby.html -- Mind-to-Ruby liaison. > > Hal