From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2007-10-16T14:54:46+09:00
Subject: Re: Rinda::TupleBag

On Oct 15, 2007, at 09:29 , Alex V. Breger wrote:
> In the current version of Ruby
> (http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/trunk/lib/rinda/tuplespace.rb)
> Rinda::TupleBag is implemented with hash by tuple size and then  
> with array.
> This realization is simple and fast on very small amount of data (e.g.
> on writing), but
> scales very bad in reading and searching.
>
> How can it be rewritten?

I have heard of attempts at backing TupleSpace with a database, but  
I've not heard of any being completed.

> May be other realizations of tuplespaces are more scalable and fast?
> Is there any attempts to make faster the standard version?

In ruby, not to my knowledge.

--
Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The
best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars