From: 7stud -- Date: 2007-10-14T11:55:56+09:00 Subject: Re: write_noblock is blocking? ara.t.howard wrote: > On Oct 13, 2007, at 6:31 PM, 7stud -- wrote: > > searching != knowing > Maybe in your native language they don't have question marks for punctuation. If you don't know what they mean, perhaps you shouldn't criticize? > besides, google pulls 'ruby write_noblock' up on the first hit > > http://www.google.com/search?q=ruby > +noblock&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en- > US:official&client=firefox-a > Now that google has had time to index this page, the hits you claim to be the Holy Grail for "write no_block" are actually links back to this thread. I wonder if you post any information on this forum that isn't erroneous. >> Of course, because the ruby documentation is so deplorable, maybe I >> should have just assumed it was a commonly used method. >> > > now you are being harsh again. > It sounds like you are suffering a case of sour grapes because I corrected you in that other thread. If you are going to post poorly written examples, which are also not responsive to a poster's question, you will get corrected. If that hurts your feelings, maybe you should construct better examples--or just not post at all. > Absolutely. The main reason that ruby documentation is "so > deplorable" is because the people complaining about it are rarely the > ones doing anything to improve it. Yes, when a language is poorly designed and/or documented, blame the people who are trying to learn it. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.