From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2007-10-14T11:17:48+09:00
Subject: Re: Is there a standard pattern for threaded access to a file?

On Oct 13, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Brian Adkins wrote:

> On Oct 13, 5:17 pm, Eric Hodel <drbr...@segment7.net> wrote:
>> On Oct 13, 2007, at 13:15 , Brian Adkins wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 13, 1:32 pm, Eric Hodel <drbr...@segment7.net> wrote:
>>>> On Oct 13, 2007, at 07:29 , Francis Cianfrocca wrote:
>>
>>> Eric, are you reading/posting on comp.lang.ruby ? I don't see  
>>> Francis'
>>> post, but both you and 7stud quoted him, so I'm wondering if it was
>>> aggregated from somewhere else.
>>
>> I use the one, true ruby-talk, the ruby-t...@ruby-lang.org mailing  
>> list.
>
> Ok, I guess some posts get dropped in the ruby-talk -> comp.lang.ruby
> transition occasionally. Probably the other direction too I suppose.

Yes, I've written about this in the past:

http://blog.grayproductions.net/articles/what_is_the_ruby_talk_gateway

Here is the relevant header from the message you are discussing that  
shows why it wasn't gated:

Content-Type: 	multipart/alternative;  boundary="---- 
=_Part_28483_17627615.1192285743535"

James Edward Gray II