From: Daniel Schierbeck <daniel.schierbeck@...>
Date: 2007-10-13T22:46:02+09:00
Subject: Re: ANN: English 0.1

--=-CsIXMCDGuP0l9MXPXhkM
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 05:02 +0900, Trans wrote:
> > On Oct 12, 11:32 am, Daniel Berger <djber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Keep the project name, but rename the library. Personally, I think a
> > > toplevel namespace of "Language" is in order. Then end users could
> > > "require 'language/english'".
>=20
> Uh.... So I'm looking into this, and I become very aware that like 80%
> of libs contained in the collection really aren't English specific. So
> now I ponder, is it's ok to put some libs in "language/..." rather
> then "language/english/..." even though my package is called
> 'english'? This doesn't sit well with me, it would seem I ought to
> make a package called "language" then.

That's probably a good idea. If English depends on some libs in
Language, just add them as dependencies to the gem.


Cheers,
Daniel

--=-CsIXMCDGuP0l9MXPXhkM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHEMwZE8pU4Gwf6g8RArTLAJ9OWLwYpbMXUegBtFWEd8veKgZUvACgnTLp
IBXHkEGKqwJ7i9gGqwKDj5o=
=NUHf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-CsIXMCDGuP0l9MXPXhkM--