From: John Joyce <dangerwillrobinsondanger@...>
Date: 2007-10-13T05:38:58+09:00
Subject: Re: ANN: English 0.1


On Oct 12, 2007, at 3:02 PM, Trans wrote:

>> On Oct 12, 11:32 am, Daniel Berger <djber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Keep the project name, but rename the library. Personally, I think a
>>> toplevel namespace of "Language" is in order. Then end users could
>>> "require 'language/english'".
>
> Uh.... So I'm looking into this, and I become very aware that like 80%
> of libs contained in the collection really aren't English specific. So
> now I ponder, is it's ok to put some libs in "language/..." rather
> then "language/english/..." even though my package is called
> 'english'? This doesn't sit well with me, it would seem I ought to
> make a package called "language" then.
>
> T.
>
>
inheritance, design, polymorphism
No biggie, you've got .8 more versions to go!