From: Trans <transfire@...>
Date: 2007-10-13T05:02:20+09:00
Subject: Re: ANN: English 0.1

> On Oct 12, 11:32 am, Daniel Berger <djber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Keep the project name, but rename the library. Personally, I think a
> > toplevel namespace of "Language" is in order. Then end users could
> > "require 'language/english'".

Uh.... So I'm looking into this, and I become very aware that like 80%
of libs contained in the collection really aren't English specific. So
now I ponder, is it's ok to put some libs in "language/..." rather
then "language/english/..." even though my package is called
'english'? This doesn't sit well with me, it would seem I ought to
make a package called "language" then.

T.