From: Eric Hodel Date: 2007-10-12T09:33:25+09:00 Subject: Re: Feedback on new Path Library On Oct 11, 2007, at 17:26 , Marc Heiler wrote: > I believe these two competing products (hehe ;> ) demonstrate that the > current solutions for the various Pathname.new File FileUtils Dir > and so > on are a little bit cumbersome (to use) > I think you can get the basename with File too or, with less typing > than > with the Pathname representation? How is FileUtils cumbersome? I find it easier than using sh due to FileUtils::Verbose and FileUtils::DryRun. Replacing RubyGems' setup.rb with a tiny, debuggable installer was incredibly easy using FileUtils and Dir. -- Poor workers blame their tools. Good workers build better tools. The best workers get their tools to do the work for them. -- Syndicate Wars