From: Ryan Davis Date: 2007-10-10T14:06:41+09:00 Subject: Re: Obfuscator for Ruby/RoR On Oct 9, 2007, at 13:08 , mortee wrote: > However, the argument still applies that (at least in its current > state) > it can't handle some of the constructs that make it worthwile > coding in > Ruby, and which most probably appear at many places in any Ruby > code not > written directly in C coding style. So it still seems to be true > that if > one codes against your software's requirements, she looses the main > advantages Ruby provides. I can't vouch for your code, but it took me less than 15 minutes to convert our original client's code over to a form that obfuscated just fine. IMO, the readability of the code was not compromised. They were able to maintain it in such a form and ship their IP as an obfuscated binary. Maybe that doesn't work for you. I dunno.