From: Simon Krahnke <overlord@...>
Date: 2007-10-04T08:05:05+09:00
Subject: Re: Non-blocking 'gets' ?

* 7stud -- <dolgun@excite.com> (00:21) schrieb:

> One thing I found puzzling is having to call STOUT.flush.  When I don't 
> include that statement, then the print statement is skipped.  Yet, if I 
> use puts instead of print, then the flush call isn't necessary.  Anyone 
> know why?

stdout is auto-flushed on newlines. puts includes a newline, print
doesn't.

mfg,                             simon .... l