From: Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10@...>
Date: 2007-09-28T23:45:10+09:00
Subject: Re: question on bottleneck of ruby

------=_Part_546_9542371.1190990707072
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 9/28/07, Byung-Hee HWANG <bh@izb.knu.ac.kr> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 19:17 +0900, Francis Cianfrocca wrote:
>  > I've found in my businesses that such fleeting opportunities come up
> all the
> > time. If you're a person who believes in proper software engineering,
> and
> > well-controlled processes, you're probably climbing the walls and
> getting
> > ready to throw things at me right now! But this is why I was talking
> about a
> > value-tradeoff. If I'm right, then there are a lot of opportunities to
> > create capturable business value that traditional methodologies
> (including
> > fast-prototype-followed-by-extensive-rewrite) simply can't touch.
> >
> > For these cases, Ruby is uniquely valuable.
> It seems like you are angry. I can feel that you like Ruby very much.



Angry? Well, no, not in particular. I reserve anger for injustice,
malfeasance, and incompetence. In short, for things that people do, not that
machines do.

;-)

------=_Part_546_9542371.1190990707072--