From: ypomonh <ypomonh@...>
Date: 2007-09-26T18:32:32+09:00
Subject: Re: Why dynamic languages for ActiveRecord..?

--------------000902030909010600000009
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Phlip wrote:
>> Ruby is a strongly, dynamically typed language. Strong because nothing
>> ever changes its type, and dynamic because you can add features to
>>     
>
> existing code, including getters and setters that make types appear dynamic.

Philip, let me see if I got it straight:

Ruby seems more well suited (eg. from Java) for implementing the 
ActiveRecord pattern, because its dynamic features make it easy/easier 
to implement (pretty much) any pattern. There is no inherent connection 
between the language and this _specific_ pattern.

Am I correct?

--------------000902030909010600000009--