From: ypomonh <ypomonh@...>
Date: 2007-09-26T00:20:54+09:00
Subject: Why dynamic languages for ActiveRecord..?

I�m having problems understanding why people prefer to implement the 
ActiveRecord pattern in dynamic languages. Of course it is very 
convenient if you don�t have to worry about what type is your column, 
but dynamic languages are more than that.

Do �val, higher-order functions, runtime alteration of object, closures, 
etc. matter in the implementation of the ActiveRecord pattern..?