From: Chad Perrin <perrin@...>
Date: 2007-09-25T07:14:27+09:00
Subject: Re: Trolls (was Re: This is why...)

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 06:55:13AM +0900, Bill Kelly wrote:
> 
> From: "Chad Perrin" <perrin@apotheon.com>
> >On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 01:08:43AM +0900, Shai Rosenfeld wrote:
> >>i find this thread interesting enough without all the 'troll' remarks. 
> >>(ie comments like chad perrin ; relevant professional remarks)
> >
> >I'm afraid I'm not entirely clear on your meaning in your parenthetical
> >comments.  Please rephrase for me, if you don't mind.
> 
> My impression was that Shai had found value in posts such as yours
> ( http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/270601 )
> and that Shai was pointing out that the meta discussion about 
> responding to trolls was essentially adding noise to the thread.

Thank you.  Looking at it again, your interpretation seems an obvious one
in retrospect.

It's definitely the headache.

. . . and thanks as well to Shai.

-- 
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
Paul Graham: "Real ugliness is not harsh-looking syntax, but having to
build programs out of the wrong concepts."