From: Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
Date: 2007-09-24T23:33:30+09:00
Subject: Re: best way to 'hide' a method when method_missing is in town

On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:04:55PM +0900, Kevin Barnes wrote:
> Of course, the method isn't really hidden/private anymore. I know one
> way to solve this with method_missing in Sub and querying
> private_methods.include? Is there a better way?

The method is still private, and can't be called via Sub's public
interface.

There probably is a better solution to your problem, but it depends on
*why* you desire this behavior.

Paul