From: Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>
Date: 2007-09-21T00:39:56+09:00
Subject: Re: Idiomatic Ruby for Array#extract / Range#length?

On 9/20/07, Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:

> On the other hand note that the definition of Range does not imply
> the collection is finite, given suitables #<=> and #succ a range can
> represent an enumeration of the rationals in [0, 1].

True in theory, but, I wonder just how you would code succ so as to
return the NEXT rational!?

-- 
Rick DeNatale

My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/