From: Victor Reyes <victor.reyes@...>
Date: 2007-09-19T20:01:13+09:00
Subject: Re: Faster Alternatives for Recursion in Ruby -Assignment

------=_Part_7165_26498807.1190199671678
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Calling someone questions/stmts "nonsense" is one easy reason to intimidate
and prevent new people from asking questions.
Many of us do not like to look/sound stupid and therefore prefer not to ask
any questions.

Regards,


On 9/19/07, Ruby Newbie <yeshvanthni@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Peter Hickman wrote:
> > Ruby Newbie wrote:
> >> I have the following assignment to be done.I have written the recursive
> >> API
> >
> > Whats a "recursive API"? You are talking nonsense here. All you have
> > done is write a recursive version and an iterative version of a
> > function. An API is something entirely different.
> >
> > The first thing you need to do is time your code and prove that one is
> > faster than the other, on my system they are practically identical.
>
> First of all its not function its a method in ruby terms. If you care
> too much about terminology better get it rite yourself first
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
>

------=_Part_7165_26498807.1190199671678--