From: James Edward Gray II Date: 2007-08-23T04:51:30+09:00 Subject: Re: [QUIZ] Process Rings (#135) On Aug 22, 2007, at 1:45 PM, Adam Shelly wrote: > On 8/17/07, Ruby Quiz wrote: >> ... >> I'll leave the definition of "processes" intentionally vague. >> Ruby doesn't have >> an equivalent to Erlang processes so we will just say that each >> process should >> represent a node where we could run some instructions >> concurrently. Be >> creative. >> > I've been thinking about virtual machines recently, so I decided to > implement one in Ruby for this quiz. That gets my vote for the craziest Ruby Quiz solution ever. Wow! You have no idea how much I regret that I wrote the quiz summary earlier today. :( James Edward Gray II