From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2007-08-21T01:04:39+09:00
Subject: Re: Current rubygems require idiom

Hi --

On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Daniel Berger wrote:

>
>
> On Aug 20, 8:42 am, Daniel DeLorme <dan...@dan42.com> wrote:
>> Daniel Berger wrote:
>>> In environments where I have multiple Ruby installations, where some use
>>> rubygems and some don't, I do this:
>>
>>> require 'rubygems' rescue nil
>>> require 'funit'
>>
>> Er, that can't possibly work since LoadError isn't a subclass of
>> StandardError
>
> Yeah, yeah, it should have been "rescue LoadError nil".

I don't think the error specification thing works with the one-line
rescue, though.


David

-- 
* Books:
   RAILS ROUTING (new! http://www.awprofessional.com/title/0321509242)
   RUBY FOR RAILS (http://www.manning.com/black)
* Ruby/Rails training
     & consulting:  Ruby Power and Light, LLC (http://www.rubypal.com)