From: Daniel Berger Date: 2007-08-21T00:35:37+09:00 Subject: Re: Current rubygems require idiom On Aug 20, 8:42 am, Daniel DeLorme wrote: > Daniel Berger wrote: > > In environments where I have multiple Ruby installations, where some use > > rubygems and some don't, I do this: > > > require 'rubygems' rescue nil > > require 'funit' > > Er, that can't possibly work since LoadError isn't a subclass of > StandardError Yeah, yeah, it should have been "rescue LoadError nil". Regards, Dan