From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2007-08-20T17:09:53+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby's equivalent to Java's "interface"

2007/8/19, david karapetyan <dkarapetyan@gmail.com>:
> Ruby modules also allow implementation details and I'm not sure if this is
> also true for java interfaces.

You can only define constants in a Java interface, no methods.  A Ruby
module is by far not the equivalent to a Java interface. The short
answer is: there is no equivalent thing in Ruby.  It is not needed
because of Ruby's dynamic nature (see Olivier's explanation).

Kind regards

robert