From: david karapetyan <dkarapetyan@...>
Date: 2007-08-19T13:12:53+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby's equivalent to Java's "interface"

------=_Part_115128_1255172.1187496778827
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Ruby modules also allow implementation details and I'm not sure if this is
also true for java interfaces.

On 8/18/07, Deepak Vohra <dvohra09@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Steve,
>
>   The Ruby equivalent of Java's interface is module.
>
>   Deepak
>
> Steve Quezadas <steve@tripperjones.com> wrote:
>   Please forgive this rather naive question, but it's a query that's
> difficult to search for on google. In java, you can program to
> interface. IE, in java, you can do:
>
> public interface QuakeBehavior {
> public void quack();
> }
>
> public class Quack implements QuckBehavior {
> public void quack() {
> System.out.println("Quack");
> }
> }
>
> public class Squeek implements QuackBehavior {
> public void quack() {
> System.out.println("Squeek");
> }
> }
>
> public class MuteQuack implements QuackBehavior {
> public void quack() {
> System.out.println("<< Silence >>");
> }
> }
>
> I am learning about Design Patterns (which is a wonderful concept), but
> I want to know the Ruby equivalent.
>
> - steve
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's
> on, when.

------=_Part_115128_1255172.1187496778827--