From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
Date: 2007-08-18T11:55:30+09:00
Subject: Re: wishing of reactive programming in ruby

Francis Cianfrocca wrote:
> On 8/17/07, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
>>
>>> (This in fact was precisely the reason that the EventMachine
>>> library was developed, and it's still on the roadmap.)
>> To someone like me who has been looking at Erlang recently, this is
>> very interesting.  Can you share and of your plans for how
>> EventMachine might evolve into this?  I'm just curious.
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, I took a close look at the Erlang concurrency verbs (spawn, and the
> verbs for sending messages to Erlang "processes") and I sketched out an
> implementation  of them above the standard EventMachine. I'd like to use
> Stomp for message-passing across "processes" that are in different OS-level
> processes or on different machines. When this gets done, current plans are
> to release it as EventMachine version 0.9.0.
> 
> Any ideas, counterarguments, or offers to help?
> 
Well, I'll certainly offer to *test* it. :)