From: Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10@...>
Date: 2007-08-18T06:52:48+09:00
Subject: Re: wishing of reactive programming in ruby

------=_Part_134504_24361403.1187387573119
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 8/17/07, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
>
>
> > (This in fact was precisely the reason that the EventMachine
> > library was developed, and it's still on the roadmap.)
>
> To someone like me who has been looking at Erlang recently, this is
> very interesting.  Can you share and of your plans for how
> EventMachine might evolve into this?  I'm just curious.



Yes, I took a close look at the Erlang concurrency verbs (spawn, and the
verbs for sending messages to Erlang "processes") and I sketched out an
implementation  of them above the standard EventMachine. I'd like to use
Stomp for message-passing across "processes" that are in different OS-level
processes or on different machines. When this gets done, current plans are
to release it as EventMachine version 0.9.0.

Any ideas, counterarguments, or offers to help?

------=_Part_134504_24361403.1187387573119--