From: Rik Hemsley <rikkus@...>
Date: 2007-08-13T23:09:57+09:00
Subject: Re: Timeout::Error - catchable?

On Aug 13, 3:04 pm, "F. Senault" <f...@lacave.net> wrote:
> Why don't you simply rescue Timeout::Error ?
>
> Timeout::timeout(1) do
>   begin
>     sleep(5)
>   rescue Timeout::Error
>     puts "rescued"
>   end
> end

I thought 'rescue' was a catch-all. Obviously not. Thanks!

Rik