From: Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2007-08-09T04:48:44+09:00
Subject: Re: Revised RCR Process (was Re: #send in 1.9)

On 8/8/07, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Phrogz <phrogz@mac.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 8, 11:17 am, "Robert Dober" <robert.do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 8/8/07, Trans <transf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > That is what I have been suggesting for years now -- a dedicated
> > > > mailing list and a wiki for the community to jointly develop RCRs on.
> > > > It also wouldn't hurt if there were some sort of stated protocols,
> > > > about what happens if an RCR gets substantial support by the
> > > > community.
> >
> > > I guess UR right a Wiki would just do great :)
> > > That at least I have learned from this discussion ...
> > > Robert
> >
> > Interesting - I disagree. I very much like the idea of a single
> > champion with his/her own personal vision for an RCR. I'd not like to
> > put forth a well-thought-out design, and have some random chump come
> > in and decide that he personally thinks it should be different and
> > migrate my RCR to something different. Sure, I could vigilantly watch
> > my page and fight with the misguided fool in version control, but that
> > would turn me off more than the current system.
> >
> > I like the idea of a single mailing list. I like the idea of a single
> > discussion thread (nested or not) per RCR, where modifications to the
> > proposal may be suggested. I don't like the idea of letting everyone
> > put their grubby little hands all over my spec. :)
>
> +1, right on.
funny you say that, because you really seemed to be annoyed with this
behavior, or are you thinking about ruby-core, please kindly evaluate
the format I suggested in my reply to Phrogz.
>
>


-- 
[...] as simple as possible, but no simpler.
-- Attributed to Albert Einstein