From: Trans Date: 2007-08-09T03:00:51+09:00 Subject: Re: Revised RCR Process (was Re: #send in 1.9) On Aug 8, 10:29 am, Phrogz wrote: > On Aug 8, 11:17 am, "Robert Dober" wrote: > > > On 8/8/07, Trans wrote: > > > That is what I have been suggesting for years now -- a dedicated > > > mailing list and a wiki for the community to jointly develop RCRs on. > > > It also wouldn't hurt if there were some sort of stated protocols, > > > about what happens if an RCR gets substantial support by the > > > community. > > I guess UR right a Wiki would just do great :) > > That at least I have learned from this discussion ... > > Robert > > Interesting - I disagree. I very much like the idea of a single > champion with his/her own personal vision for an RCR. I'd not like to > put forth a well-thought-out design, and have some random chump come > in and decide that he personally thinks it should be different and > migrate my RCR to something different. Sure, I could vigilantly watch > my page and fight with the misguided fool in version control, but that > would turn me off more than the current system. > > I like the idea of a single mailing list. I like the idea of a single > discussion thread (nested or not) per RCR, where modifications to the > proposal may be suggested. I don't like the idea of letting everyone > put their grubby little hands all over my spec. :) Oh, I agree with you. There would have to still "owners" of an RCR. If the honor system wasn't enough --and I guess ultimately it's not, then the admins of an RCR would have to grant permissions for others to work on it. T.