From: dblack@... Date: 2007-08-08T19:59:47+09:00 Subject: Re: #send in 1.9 Hi -- On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Gregory Brown wrote: > On 8/7/07, Trans wrote: >> >> >> On Aug 7, 11:14 am, "Gregory Brown" wrote: >>> On 8/7/07, Trans wrote: >>> >>>>> Then write an RCR and see how it does. I personally prefer send / >>>>> send! but am fine with send / funcall() >>> >>>> See how it does? You're clearly unaware of the current RCR state of >>>> affairs. >>> >>> Please elaborate. I don't see an RCR open for this, or rejected, for >>> that matter.http://rcrchive.net/ >> >> The RCR system is in a rather anemic state. Honestly, it's not worth >> the effort. It's better just to bring it up here and hope some of the >> popular stances filter up. > > Yeah, you're right. But I think that might be partially our fault for > never bringing things beyond RubyTalk :) As far as I know, all the RCR process needs is people to submit RCRs. If anyone knows of anything technically wrong with the site, please let me know. I think people were unhappy about Matz's decision to start from scratch a little while back, but the process only exists in the first place as a mechanism for Matz to get information and discuss ideas, so it's really up to him if he wants people to resubmit. David -- * Books: RAILS ROUTING (new! http://www.awprofessional.com/title/0321509242) RUBY FOR RAILS (http://www.manning.com/black) * Ruby/Rails training & consulting: Ruby Power and Light, LLC (http://www.rubypal.com)