From: Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>
Date: 2007-08-08T10:25:30+09:00
Subject: Re: #send in 1.9

On 8/7/07, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 7, 11:14 am, "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/7/07, Trans <transf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > Then write an RCR and see how it does.  I personally prefer send /
> > > > send! but am fine with send / funcall()
> >
> > > See how it does? You're clearly unaware of the current RCR state of
> > > affairs.
> >
> > Please elaborate.  I don't see an RCR open for this,  or rejected, for
> > that matter.http://rcrchive.net/
>
> The RCR system is in a rather anemic state. Honestly, it's not worth
> the effort. It's better just to bring it up here and hope some of the
> popular stances filter up.

Yeah, you're right.  But I think that might be partially our fault for
never bringing things beyond RubyTalk :)

( I have an RCR that recommends a compromise for Proc#yield that I've
not yet submitted)