From: Dan <dan.gottlieb@...>
Date: 2007-08-07T19:19:58+09:00
Subject: Re: Better way to do this? Currently using two method_missing calls...

On Aug 6, 2:53 am, "Robert Klemme" <shortcut...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2007/8/4, Dan <dan.gottl...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Ok, I see where you were going now.  I guess I could go in that
> > direction, but since sending functions and objects to the web service
> > is just done via POST params, so I'd rather route all the requests to
> > the "call" class method on my API class.  Any ideas on how to do this
> > without having to create a instance of the API class (or any class)
> > just to store the "object" name ?
>
> This is what I'd do (attached).  Note, you need to know the number of
> invocations in this example.  The pattern could however use other
> criteria for triggering the action.
>
> Kind regards
>
> robert
>
>  call-recorder.rb
> 1KDownload

Hi Robert,

Thanks for the reply.  I was wondering if that there was a way to do
this sort of thing in ruby without having to create a class instance
just to store the method calls.  However, it looks like that's not
possible, which I kind of understand.  Not perfect for my situation,
but it should be good enough.

Dan