From: Dan <dan.gottlieb@...>
Date: 2007-08-05T00:05:00+09:00
Subject: Re: Better way to do this? Currently using two method_missing calls...

On Aug 4, 10:55 am, Xavier Noria <f...@hashref.com> wrote:
> El Aug 4, 2007, a las 4:20 PM, Dan escribi�:
>
> > Ok, I see where you were going now.  I guess I could go in that
> > direction, but since sending functions and objects to the web service
> > is just done via POST params, so I'd rather route all the requests to
> > the "call" class method on my API class.  Any ideas on how to do this
> > without having to create a instance of the API class (or any class)
> > just to store the "object" name ?
>
> The idea is then that something like
>
>    API.images.find_by_name(name)
>
> translates to a POST request where "images" and "find_by_name" are
> string values?
>
> -- fxn

exactly