From: Dan <dan.gottlieb@...>
Date: 2007-08-04T20:29:59+09:00
Subject: Re: Better way to do this? Currently using two method_missing calls...

Thanks for the reply.  I'm probably being dense here, but I don't see
how Delegator would help in this scenario.  Can you explain what you
mean?

Thanks!
Dan

On Aug 3, 8:02 pm, Xavier Noria <f...@hashref.com> wrote:
> El Aug 4, 2007, a las 1:50 AM, Dan escribi�:
>
> > I'm building a wrapper around a web service and I'd like to have my
> > class simply pass through calls to the remote service (since the
> > remote service will be adding new objects and methods faster then I'll
> > be updating the library, I need my class to be accept anything).
>
> Wouldn't the standard delegator library suffice? The description in
> the Pickaxe is more complete than the rdoc shown by ri.
>
> -- fxn