From: Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
Date: 2007-08-04T09:02:43+09:00
Subject: Re: Better way to do this? Currently using two method_missing calls...

El Aug 4, 2007, a las 1:50 AM, Dan escribi�:

> I'm building a wrapper around a web service and I'd like to have my
> class simply pass through calls to the remote service (since the
> remote service will be adding new objects and methods faster then I'll
> be updating the library, I need my class to be accept anything).

Wouldn't the standard delegator library suffice? The description in  
the Pickaxe is more complete than the rdoc shown by ri.

-- fxn