From: Trans <transfire@...>
Date: 2007-08-03T10:31:17+09:00
Subject: Re: #send in 1.9



On Aug 2, 9:05 pm, Daniel DeLorme <dan...@dan42.com> wrote:
>
> This topic again? I've lost count of how many threads I've read about
> the naming of send/funcall. Has anyone kept a full list of the numerous
> suggestions? I can remember:
>
> (public-only)
> send
> __send
> __send__
> object_send
>
> (all)
> funcall
> send!
> __send!
> instance_send

Not quite. This time I'm asking that we do the opposite. Pick a new
name for "public send" and leave the old one alone. (Of course,
possibly someone else suggested it before, but I don't recall).

T.